Archive for February, 2012

posted by JasperC on Feb 29

Dubai: Toufan won the third heat, but it was Al Zeer who picked up the overall honours at the end of the final heat of the Dubai Traditional 43ft Dhow Sailing Championship held at the Dubai International Marine Club (DIMC) yesterday.

Held on a shorter course due to unsteady and fluctuating winds yesterday evening, Toufan — owned and skippered by Ahmad Saeed Salim Al Rumaithi — swept away the rest of the field to win its first race this season.

Burraq, owned by Ahmad Mohammad Rashid Al Rumaithi and skippered by Rashid Mohammad Rashid Al Rumaithi, was placed second, while Wafi — with Khalaf Butti Al Ghasheesh at the helm — came in third to finish the podium.

However, the season’s honours were reserved for Al Zeer, who came in 10th yesterday, but could still walk away the overall winner thanks to emphatic wins in the first two races of the championships in December and last month. The boat — owned by Shaikh Hamdan Bin Mohammad Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Crown Prince of Dubai and Chairman of Dubai Sports Council — was skippered by Mohammad Rashid Bin Shaheen.

Article continues below

© 2011 Gulf News (www.gulfnews.com)

posted by JasperC on Feb 29

Story By: Talk of the Nation

Read Laura Vanderkam’s Wall Street Journal piece “Are You As Busy As You Think?

Writer Laura Vanderkam says she used to tell people that she was “too busy to breathe.” In a piece for The Wall Street Journal, Vanderkam explains the changes she made to get the most out of the 168 hours in each week.

posted by JasperC on Feb 29

Autoridades em uma investigação em curso no mundo todo sobre a maneira como taxas de juros essenciais são definidas estão se focando em um pequeno número de operadores suspeitos de tentar influenciar outros funcionários de bancos para manipular as taxas, segundo pessoas a par da situação.

A iniciativa faz parte de investigações feitas por autoridades reguladoras e agentes da lei na Europa, Japão e Estados Unidos, iniciadas há mais de um ano. As autoridades estão tentando determinar se os grandes bancos conspiraram para manipular taxas de juro de referência, como a Taxa Interbancária de Londres, ou Libor, e a Taxa Interbancária de Tóquio, ou Tibor.

Não há indicação de que as alegadas ações por parte dos operadores tenham resultado em casos em que funcionários do banco agiram de forma indevida na definição das taxas, ou que tenha havido qualquer conluio entre os bancos, dizem pessoas a par do assunto.

A taxa Libor, supervisionada pela Associação dos Banqueiros Britânicos, afeta o custo de trilhões de dólares em empréstimos e derivativos. As taxas Libor e Tibor são calculadas diariamente para diferentes moedas, utilizando as cotações apresentadas por um painel de bancos. Ao supostamente influenciar essas cotações, os operadores poderiam aumentar seus lucros nos derivativos associados às taxas, segundo os reguladores.

Pessoas a par da investigação disseram que as autoridades japonesas descobriram dezenas de e-mails e mensagens de bate-papo on-line entre os operadores, que pareciam tentar influenciar outros funcionários dos bancos que fornecem cotações Libor ou Tibor e que estão envolvidos no processo de definição dos juros.

Nenhum dos operadores foi acusado de delito. As autoridades japonesas iniciaram processos civis contra dois bancos. Vários bancos divulgaram que estão sob investigação na Europa e nos EUA, mas isso não indica que daí resultarão quaisquer acusações.

(Colaborou Joseph Palazzolo.)

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)

posted by JasperC on Feb 29

[GARDNER]

Emily Berl for The Wall Street Journal

Jose Cosme shows his fruit and vegetables to philanthropist Laurie Tisch, in the South Bronx.

Laurie Tisch is going to the Super Bowl, but first she had to pick up some vegetables in the Bronx. “Thursday I’m on the friends and family charter,” she reported. “Hopefully I’ll make it there for the friends and family dinner,” hosted, she said, by Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay.

Ms. Tisch’s family are co-owners of the New York Giants, though she may be better known for her philanthropy around New York City as head of the Laurie M. Tisch Illumination Foundation. Its efforts include supporting the NYC Green Cart Initiative, which brings fresh fruits and vegetables, sold on sidewalk carts, to the city’s underserved neighborhoods.

Or at least Ms. Tisch was probably better known for her good deeds than her connection to the Giants until the team won the NFC Championship game against the San Francisco 49ers on Jan. 22. If you happened to see the game, or rather the postgame locker room ceremonies, Ms. Tisch was the person in the corner of your screen ecstatically waving some sort of Giants victory banner or T-shirt from the trophy presentation podium.

“The minute the game is over they come out with the hats and T-shirts,” she explained. “Some player said, ‘You want to get up there?’”

I asked her what the response had been among friends, who were probably more familiar spotting her on the society pages than among tattooed football players. “Several friends said, ‘What did your mother say about you in the locker room with these naked guys?’ She said, ‘Good for you!’” Ms. Tisch replied.

“Body fat isn’t a big worry of these guys,” she observed, apparently closely. “The entire team has less body fat than me.”

Reducing body fat and raising health in the city’s low-income neighborhoods by increasing the availability of fresh produce is the Green Cart Initiative’s purpose. The carts operate in what are sometimes known as “food deserts”—areas of the city where there is no problem finding a McDonald’s or a KFC, but a fresh apple is another thing.

Indeed, both McDonald’s and Kentucky Fried Chicken had planted their flags near the bustling intersection of 149th Street and Third Avenue in the Grand Concourse section of the Bronx, where I met Ms. Tisch on Tuesday afternoon. There was also a doughnut shop and a pizza parlor; the Green Cart we were visiting there, manned by Jose Cosme and his wife, Eva, felt like a good-natured rebuke to all those kids stopping for a greasy slice on the way home from school.

There didn’t seem to be much crossover between the pizza and produce buyers—no one seemed to be topping off their slice with a piece of fresh fruit—but Mr. Cosme said that business is decent with good weeks and bad weeks. “It pays the bills. I have two kids in college. It has helped,” he said.

I’ve frankly always avoided buying my vegetables from carts, suspecting their sources. But Mr. Cosme purchases his produce daily at the Hunts Point Terminal Market—as do the 215 other active Green Cart permit holders in the Bronx (there are over 500 citywide) and where many of the city’s grocery stores and restaurants also go for fruits and vegetables.

“4 a.m. Monday,” he said, referring to the time he arrives at Hunts Point. “5 a.m. the rest of the week.” He gets to his spot at the corner of 149th Street between 8 and 8:30 a.m. almost every day of the year, weather permitting, and remains there until 4 p.m. during the winter and 6 p.m. in the summer.

Emily Berl for The Wall Street Journal

His cart.

The vendors either rent or purchase their carts, and buy all the produce they have for sale. But the Green Cart Initiative does provide them urban retail survival training, and the handsome green NYC Green Cart umbrellas that let customers know they’re fully licensed and that their quality can be counted on.

“We make clear upfront this is a sales position,” explained Cassandra Flechsig, a Green Cart program manager with Karp Resources, a food-industry strategic planning group under contract to the Initiative. “I lead a lot of workshops: how to select a good location, engage the community, merchandise your product.”

Indeed, there is an argument to be made that food bought from the carts may be as good or better than that purchased in supermarkets, and most probably cheaper—though the point of the program isn’t to compete with stores but to bring produce to neighborhoods where supermarkets are often few and far between.

“The community does like it,” said Mr. Cosme. “I have a lady who comes here once a week on the bus. She doesn’t like the fruits in the supermarket. She’d rather spend the $2.25 coming and going. I have people coming from 138th Street.”

I can attest to the cart’s quality. I bought a Red Delicious apple the size of softball for 50 cents. And Ms. Tisch, who can afford her peaches and pomegranates from Eli’s, or Grace’s Market, said she also buys her fruits and vegetables from carts.

But what about avocados? There is nothing quite like a perfectly ripe Haas avocado. But how often can you go to the supermarket and find them? The ones they sell, while undoubtedly edible at some point in the distant future, are typically hard as rocks.

“They have got to be ripe,” Mr. Cosme said. “When I buy, I buy in quantity. I leave them in the box until they get ripe and them I bring them.”

Sadly, he’d sold out.

Ms. Tisch’s Illumination Fund provided the seed money for the Green Cart Initiative, the city authorizing 1,000 new street vending permits in 2008 —though not without significant pushback from businesses who saw them as potential competitors. The fund also underwrote a NYC Green Cart Cookbook, which vendors can give away to customers, and financed “The Apple Pushers,” a documentary that highlights five Green Cart vendors and the extraordinary challenges they’ve faced in gaining even a tiny sliver of the American dream.

Ms. Tisch’s own dream at the moment is for a Giants victory come Sunday and to make sure she ends up celebrating in the correct locker room. She confided that after the Giants win over Green Bay on Jan. 15, and wearing a Giants headband and her 2008 Super Bowl Champs ring, “I followed this whole big group of people,” into the Green Bay locker room. “It was so quiet. I see a lot of green and yellow and think, ‘I don’t think I’m colorblind.’”

Someone suggested she use her visibility—if she gets the opportunity to do another trophy presentation T-shirt waving victory dance—to promote the Green Cart Initiative. “Whatever they hand me—apples, I hope,” she said. “Maybe when they do the victory parade we can get these guys to do the food.”


ralph.gardner@wsj.com

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)

posted by JasperC on Feb 29


SAN FRANCISCO |
Tue Feb 21, 2012 8:59am EST

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – Josh Buckley, chief executive of an online gaming start-up, is looking forward to next month’s Game Developers Conference in San Francisco, particularly for the parties and the accompanying schmoozing with industry A-listers.

There’s one problem: Buckley, who will turn 20 this week on February 22, may be turned away from many of the parties because he is not old enough to drink. His fake ID was recently confiscated, and the two new ones he ordered from a company in China have not yet arrived.

Such are the dilemmas facing the ever-younger entrepreneurs that Silicon Valley investors are backing these days. While little data on the phenomenon exists, venture capitalists say they are funding more chief executives under age 21 than ever before.

“At a certain point, they can’t get much younger or we’re going to be invested in preschool,” quipped Marc Andreessen, whose venture-capital firm Andreessen Horowitz is one of several that backs Buckley’s company, MinoMonsters.

Andreessen and other venture capitalists say the entrepreneurs they fund at 18 or 19 typically have been prepping for years — learning computer code, taking on ambitious freelance projects and educating themselves on the Internet.

Some are self-consciously molding themselves in the image of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, 27, who created computer games as a child and was taking a graduate-level computer course by his early teens.

Internet businesses that target consumers make a sweet spot for the baby-faced, because online companies often require relatively little capital. A semiconductor start-up might require $10 million to $20 million in the early stages, noted Joe Kraus of Google Ventures, and that would be tough even for the most talented youngster.

“If I’m going to write that big a check, I’m going to invest in people who’ve done it before,” he said. “But if you look at it as, ‘Hey, I’m going to raise $500,000,’ there’s a lot of ways to raise that.”

Kraus helped back Airy Labs, an educational social-gaming company run by 20-year-old Andrew Hsu that raised $1.5 million. Hsu is now learning the same hard lessons as many of his elders: the company recently laid off staff and is looking to rent out some of its office space in Palo Alto, California. Hsu said the company is taking a different direction and focusing on a line of new products in math, language arts and science.

Kraus said his biggest hiccups with young entrepreneurs are the business references they don’t understand because they are too young to be aware of them.

Andreessen says more than one young entrepreneur has asked him: “What did Netscape do again?” Andreessen co-founded Netscape, which developed the first commercial Web browser and helped launch the Internet era, shortly after graduating from college in 1993.

“I was 9 years old” during the first Internet boom, says Brian Wong, 20, who runs reward-network Kiip. He has had his fill of stories about companies that tanked amid the dot-com bust of 2000. The first time he heard the name Webvan, a legendary dot-com failure, “I had to look it up,” he recalled.

Wong has raised more than $4 million from Hummer Winblad Venture Partners and others.

He believes his age helps him and other youthful entrepreneurs. “You’re expected to be limitless,” he said. “Kind of destructive.”

While the freewheeling ways of youth may be a positive for venture capitalists, they are less appreciated by landlords. Tim Chae, the 20-year-old chief executive and co-founder of social-media marketing company PostRocket, said his age and lack of credit created problems when he moved to San Francisco last year and needed an apartment. Finally, his father had to drive the 88 miles from Sacramento to co-sign a lease.

Chae, a Babson College dropout, now lives in nearby Mountain View and attends 500 Startups, a crash course for young companies run by a venture firm of the same name. He has raised a small amount of capital and hopes the upcoming Facebook IPO will help investors look more kindly on young entrepreneurs. “Thank God for Zuckerberg,” he says.

Zuckerberg, who left Harvard after two years, is helping recast the notion of dropping out of college. Peter Thiel, an early investor in Facebook and a co-founder of PayPal, is encouraging others to try that path through two-year fellowships for students who take a break from school, move to San Francisco and pursue their entrepreneurial aspirations.

That’s what 17-year-old Laura Deming did when she won a fellowship based on her goal of finding and funding anti-aging technologies and left the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Because she is not yet 18, she finds herself faxing documents such as non-disclosure agreements to her dad back in Boston to co-sign.

Other young entrepreneurs have trouble negotiating the highways and byways of Silicon Valley quite literally. Sahil Lavingia, 19, recalls a day last summer when he had several meetings scheduled on Sand Hill Road — home to many of the nation’s leading venture-capital firms — and no car to get there. The journey of just a few miles took hours by the time Lavingia rode a local train a couple of stops, caught a bus to Stanford University and then hopped a shuttle bus to the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, which is on Sand Hill Road.

Another time, dreading the combination of a hot day and a sweaty walk around Palo Alto, he pulled on a pair of shorts, even though he was heading to a meeting with blue-chip VC Accel Partners. The outfit — casual even by laid-back Silicon Valley standards — didn’t stop Accel from investing. Lavingia, an alumnus of hot online bulletin-board company Pinterest, raised $1.1 million for his payments start-up, Gumroad.

Buckley also ran into problems getting himself to Sand Hill Road. One night he stayed up until 3 a.m. and slept too late to get to a scheduled meeting with a venture-capital firm. “It didn’t go down too well,” he said, adding that his profuse apologies and requests to reschedule were met with a curt “no thank you.”

Not to worry. Buckley, who had already sold a company while in high school for a sum he says was in the low six figures, raised more than $1 million from Andreessen Horowitz and others.

At the time of the missed meeting, he was attending Y Combinator, a three-month program for start-ups. In a nod to the boy wizard of book and movie fame, Y Combinator co-founder Paul Graham has called Buckley “the Harry Potter of startups,” but said he was not the youngest to win admission to the program.

That honor goes to John Collison, now co-founder of payment company Stripe, who was admitted at age 16, but did not go through the program, Graham says. Instead, he and his then-19-year-old brother merged their company with another, Auctomatic, and sold it to a Canadian company for $5 million in cash and stock.

Most of the young entrepreneurs say their interest lies in building rather than selling their companies. Buckley had to say as much in response to inquiries he said received recently from Facebook about a possible sale. His determination not to sell stems from advice he received from a successful executive he met last year at Y Combinator: Mark Zuckerberg.

(Reporting By Sarah McBride. Editing by Jonathan Weber and Maureen Bavdek)

© 2011 REUTERS (www.reuters.com)

posted by JasperC on Feb 29

Beijing: China needs to reduce the dominant role of state companies in its economy and promote free markets to keep growth steady and avoid potential crises, the World Bank and Chinese researchers said yesterday.

The recommendations, in a report on China’s development through to 2030, come amid a debate in the ruling inner circle over the future course of economic reform as a new generation of leaders prepares to take office this year.

The emphasis on curbing state industry clashes with Beijing’s strategy over the past decade of building government-owned champions in fields from banking to technology, and is likely to provoke opposition.

"As China’s leaders know, the country’s current economic growth model is unsustainable," World Bank president Robert Zoellick said at a conference about the report. He said China has reached a "turning point" and needs to "redefine the role of the state."

Article continues below

© 2011 Gulf News (www.gulfnews.com)

posted by JasperC on Feb 29

Em julho, quando o site imobiliário Zillow Inc. estava procurando um banco de Wall Street para administrar sua oferta inicial de ações de US$ 80 milhões, o Citigroup Inc. estava no topo da lista.

IAB

O analista de internet do Citigroup, Mark Mahaney

O principal atrativo: o famoso analista de internet do banco, Mark Mahaney.

Mahaney “é amplamente considerado um dos analistas mais importantes cobrindo a internet, então sim, isso foi um elemento crucial” da escolha do Zillow pelo Citi, disse Spencer Rascoff, diretor-presidente da Zillow, numa entrevista ao The Wall Street Journal.

Durante o processo de venda das ações, Mahaney “provavelmente passou umas 100 horas no telefone com investidores”, lembra Rascoff.

À medida que as ofertas iniciais de ações ganhavam proeminência ano passado, com aberturas de capital da LinkedIn Corp., da Groupon Inc. e da Zynga Inc. – e com a oferta do Facebook Inc. prevista para logo – os analistas de ações têm desfrutado de uma importância vista pela última vez há uma década, quando alguns deles ajudaram a alimentar o primeiro boom das empresas ponto com.

A ressurgência ocorre apesar das regras adotadas pelo setor nos Estados Unidos em 2003, que foram criadas para reduzir as pressão nos analistas para gerar operações de banco de investimento para as empresas em que trabalham.

As regras impedem que os analistas participem de reuniões em que os banqueiros se oferecem para subscrever ofertas iniciais de ações. E elas também limitam a capacidade dos analistas de trabalhar com banqueiros e receber pagamentos ligados diretamente ao volume total da transação.

Mas elas ainda permitem que analistas participem da venda para investidores das ações dessas ofertas. Para uma empresa que busca um subscritor, isso significa que ela pode consultar analistas sobre suas opiniões acerca da empresa — em outras palavras, a empresa pode simplesmente sair pescando a análise mais favorável.

As regras de 2003 reduziram “drasticamente a hipocrisia evidente” dos analistas que emitem publicamente recomendações de compra enquanto aconselham nos bastidores que os investidores vendam a ação, disse Jay Ritter, professor de finanças da Universidade da Flórida. Mas os analistas continuam podendo servir como vendedores, diz ele, conseguindo ofertas iniciais de ações e recebendo mais por isso no decorrer do processo.

Mahaney, que entrou no Citi em 2005, mantém há quatro anos o posto de analista de internet mais importante do setor, segundo as pesquisas de opinião realizadas pela revista “Institutional Investor”. Embora o Citi tenha sido apenas o sexto maior subscritor de ofertas iniciais de ações de empresas de internet no ano passado, segundo a Dealogic, a reputação de Mahaney já ajudou o Citi a conquistar algumas operações do segmento, disseram executivos que contrataram o banco.

As ofertas iniciais de ações de internet renderam ao Citi um total de US$ 24,9 milhões em comissões ano passado, afirma a Dealogic.

Os analistas não são o único fator analisado pelas empresas na hora de escolher os banqueiros que subscreverão suas ofertas de ações, dizem fontes do setor. As empresas também analisam o histórico dos bancos em conseguir vender as ofertas, por exemplo, algo que pode refletir o vigor de suas marcas ou equipes de vendas.

As empresas que escolheram o Citi como principal subscritor de suas ofertas iniciais tendem a receber avaliações favoráveis de Mahaney. Ele deu três recomendações de comprar para acordos subscritos pelo Citi em 2011 — para a Active Network Inc., a Bankrate Inc. e a Zillow — e uma neutra, para o Groupon Inc. Ele iniciou sua cobertura de quatro ofertas iniciais que não foram subscritas pelo Citi com três recomendações para “manter” e uma para comprar.

As três ofertas iniciais do Citi que ele recomendou a compra tiveram desempenho médio abaixo do resto do mercado, de 5,7 pontos porcentuais; as ações de ofertas não subscritas pela Citi que ele avaliou como neutras tiveram desempenho ainda pior e ficaram 45 pontos porcentuais abaixo da média do mercado.

O Citigroup informou num comunicado que “as recomendações de Mark são totalmente objetivas e não têm correlação com o fato de subscrevermos ou assessorarmos qualquer empresa”.

Mahaney admitiu a clientes que ele não é sempre que acerta. Ele foi pessimista em relação à Google Inc., enquanto a ação subia depois da abertura de capital. Ele também atualizou sua análise sobre a Netflix Inc. para comprar em abril do ano passado, pouco antes da ação despencar.

Mahaney revisou acertadamente sua análise sobre a Amazon.com Inc. em 2009, antes de as ações mais que dobraram, e exortou os clientes a comprar ações da Priceline.com Inc., em 2008, pouco antes delas triplicarem.

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)

posted by JasperC on Feb 29

Forget the free toaster. If you’re looking to open a brokerage account or IRA, or add to an existing one, you may well be rewarded with a chunk of change—not to mention free trades and Apple gift cards—if you act soon.

Financial firms are in a slugfest for your business, and brokerage companies have “elevated their game” to compete more openly with traditional banks, says Scott Smith, associate director, Cerulli Associates, a financial-services research firm.

It can make sense for brokerage firms to “buy” deposits from bargain-hunting investors because the firms can earn back the costs of the promotions over time through ongoing asset-management fees, explains Mr. Smith.

Terry Wong

Investors, however, should weigh several factors—including investment selection, costs and performance—before taking any deals

And don’t forget, some “freebies” are taxable. Many Citibank customers felt blindsided last month when they received notices that airline miles they got for opening new accounts last year produced taxable income.

Companies are required to report the value of certain promotions to the Internal Revenue Service, but they aren’t required to tell you this ahead of time—and most don’t. “The IRS expects us to know that we don’t get anything for free,” or at least tax-free, says Cheryl Riedlinger, a lawyer with the Tax Reporting Group and an expert on the taxation of financial institutions.

So look before you leap. Here’s a rundown of some of the limited-time-only deals:

  • TD Ameritrade is offering free trades and cash if you open a regular brokerage account or individual retirement account by Feb. 29. A $2,000 investment gets you 500 free trades for 60 days. Deposits of $25,000 and up also earn cash bonuses of $100 to $600.
  • ING Direct will add $50 to IRAs opened by March 1 with a minimum deposit of $200.
  • Merrill Edge is paying cash bonuses of $50 to $500 for IRAs opened by April 15. Minimum investment requirement: $10,000.
  • Scottrade will kick in $100 to IRAs opened before April 16 with a minimum rollover of $15,000. It also will reimburse account-transfer fees (up to $100) charged by your old broker.
  • Charles Schwab is doling out cash bonuses of $200 to $2,500 for rollovers of $50,000 or more made by April 17 to new or existing IRAs.
  • E-Trade is offering 500 free trades over 60 days for IRAs opened by April 17 with a minimum deposit of $2,000. Deposits of $25,000 and up also earn cash bonuses of $100 to $600.
  • Fidelity Investments is handing out Apple gift cards worth $100 to $500 with deposits of $75,000 or more into new or existing brokerage accounts (but not IRAs) by June 30.

For taxable accounts, if you earn $600 or more in promotions in a year, your brokerage firm sends you a 1099-Misc tax form letting you know the income that was produced. This is the amount it reports to the IRS and on which you owe tax. (Typically, firms don’t have to report promotions totaling less than $600, but investors still owe tax on them.) For example, TD Ameritrade is treating its cash awards as taxable but not the free trades, which it considers rebates, which are neither reportable nor taxable.

The reporting requirement for gift cards is murkier, says Ms. Riedlinger. Fidelity, for one, will report the face value of its Apple gift cards on the 1099-Misc if an investor’s total miscellaneous income from Fidelity hits $600 or more during the year.

For IRAs, make sure cash bonuses don’t put you over your annual contribution limit—typically $5,000 for investors under 50 and $6,000 for those age 50 and up—or you will end up with a mess on your hands having to remove “excess” contributions.

Find out how the firm is treating IRA bonuses. At ING Direct, they will be paid to accounts by March 16, designated as 2012 contributions, and reflected on next year’s Form 5498 for IRA contributions. At E-Trade and Scottrade, by contrast, the bonuses will be considered IRA income, which isn’t currently reportable or taxable.

If you’re looking to switch brokers anyway, a bonus award can at least make up for any account-transfer fees assessed by your old firm. Just be aware that most of these offers require you to keep your new account open for at least several months, otherwise you’ll forfeit your award.

Finally, don’t let an offer for free trading be an inducement for frequent trading, which studies have shown rarely pays off. Aim instead to keep your investment costs low by, for example, sticking with inexpensive index funds. All else being equal, it’s not what you earn that counts but what you get to keep after taxes and fees.


investingbasics.wsj@gmail.com

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)

posted by JasperC on Feb 28

For a growing number of older Americans, retirement is bringing a fresh challenge: learning to juggle.

The juggling act in question is how best to continue working and still have the flexibility to relax or pursue other interests that many people want—and sometimes simply need—later in life.

For some older Americans facing tight budgets, the idea of working during what they thought would be a full-time retirement may be a letdown. And in today’s world, where technology can lead to expectations of being reachable by employers and clients at any hour and any day of the week, the thought of never having “downtime” is particularly worrisome.

Leslie Lammle

But juggling retirement and work, especially if it’s an extension of a fulfilling career, can be easily managed—and even rewarding—by keeping a few basic ideas in mind. Technology can actually be a help, not a hindrance, when it comes to getting time away from work.

At age 87, Peter White heads to an office each day in Williamstown, Mass., where he works as a financial adviser after a long career in corporate law and investment management. But every Monday and Thursday he takes a few hours off and heads to Williams College where he audits courses on history. These days, he’s learning more about World War II and Japan, where he had firsthand experience in the Army.

The key for Mr. White is working in a small office with a job where he’s essentially his own boss. While he has responsibilities that come with that job, “I’m my own man,” he says.

More Americans are staying on the job. Among men and women age 65 to 69, nearly one-third were in the work force in 2011, up from 24.5% in 2000, according to a report from the Employee Benefit Research Institute in Washington. Among those 70 to 74, nearly 19% were working in 2011, up from 13.5% in 2000 and 11.3% in 1990.

Jean Setzfand, a financial-security specialist at AARP, says that while the traditional definition of retirement is changing, often to include working, “it’s important to find time and be in control of your life.”

For snowbirds who maintain homes in warmer climates as well as in their native colder environs, it may be easier to separate work from “retirement” by keeping the job as much as possible for the time spent back north.

Gerald Green is a 78-year-old semiretired attorney with his own practice. He spends seven to eight months of the year in Florida, and while there, commutes to New York’s Long Island every other week for a few days at a time. His wife, Rosalie, stays in Florida when he makes the trip to New York, but they try to take frequent short vacations together.

Although he carries a limited case load, he says it can still be difficult to juggle both aspects of his life. Recently a closing for a real-estate deal was delayed and required him to stay longer in New York than planned. And in a few weeks, the Greens are planning to take a cruise, but a court case was scheduled for that date. He’ll either postpone the court date or have another lawyer handle it.

While he loves his work and is reachable by cellphone for his clients any time, he makes it clear to his clients that his downtime is important. “My clients are aware that I spend so much time in Florida,” he says. Ultimately, “they have the choice to stay with me or not.”

For many older workers, keeping up with the rapidly changing world of technology is presenting a challenge.

Jack Leinwohl, 71, had to have his children teach him how to use a computer. But he now sees technology as providing him the flexibility he needs with work.

Mr. Leinwohl, who lives in Delray Beach, Fla., owns a UPS Store. However, thanks to his cellphone and the ease of tracking his business remotely through his personal computer, on many days he can spend only a couple of hours in the store.

This leaves him time to play golf, relax by the pool or socialize. During summers he’s been able to head north and spend time in the Pocono Mountains or Atlantic City, N.J. “I’ve got my laptop and can be away for eight weeks,” he says. “Technology works in my favor.”

Of course, for many older workers, health issues can crop up. Mr. White in Massachusetts had a triple bypass and decided to switch offices and shorten his commute to its present 15 miles from what had been a 40-mile trip to Albany, N.Y. And there is simply the matter of often having less stamina.

Still, he says, finding time for both the rewards of his job and interests in his life is worth it.

“I’m very fortunate,” Mr. White says.

—Email: next@wsj.com

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)

posted by JasperC on Feb 28

[CARTOONS1]

Courtesy of the Cartoon Museum.

‘The Queen at the Queen Vic’ (2002) by Wally Fawkes (aka Trog).

London

To celebrate her 21st birthday in April 1947, the British magazine Punch commissioned a cartoon of Princess Elizabeth. Drawn by E.H. Shepard, better known for his whimsical illustrations of Winnie the Pooh, she is in a summery dress, clutching a bouquet from her grateful subjects—an array of fairies with messages reading Happiness, Peace, Prosperity. In its sweet way it was a breakthrough. It was the first depiction of the future queen in cartoon form and reflects a respect for the monarchy that would be inconceivable today.

Or does it?

As one of the many events to celebrate Elizabeth II’s Diamond Jubilee, London’s Cartoon Museum is staging “Her Maj: 60 Years of Unofficial Portraits of the Queen,” which displays work by 30 members of that most independent-minded, left-leaning, antiestablishment bunch: British newspaper and magazine cartoonists. Many would see themselves in the tradition of James Gillray and Thomas Rowlandson, who traduced politicians and monarchs alike with boisterous savagery in the 18th and 19th centuries. Kenneth Baker, one of Margaret Thatcher’s ministers (himself cruelly satirized as an obsequious snail) and now an avid cartoon collector, notes with considerable relish: “The King Georges were shown fornicating, vomiting and defecating. There was no quarter.”

But as the museum’s curator Anita O’Brien says: “Even before the queen came to the throne, caricatures of the royal family had become out of bounds. In 1923, when the queen’s father and mother married, Punch depicted them taking off in a plane—but only from behind. When George VI became king in 1936, the magazine reproduced the same cartoon. It had published nothing else of the royal couple in between.

Her Maj: 60 Years of Unofficial Portraits of the Queen

The Cartoon Museum

Through April 8


cartoonmuseum.org

“That tradition stayed with the queen,” says Ms. O’Brien. “She does not appear at all in the early cartoons. She would be hidden in a coach or shown from behind or, at best, in profile.”

In a Michael Cummings sketch of the coronation in 1953, an American is seen daydreaming about its panoply of horses, carriages and guards—but of the new queen, not a glimpse. In fact, the drawing tells us more about British stereotyping of Americans and their predilection for the Royal Family.

“Stop, Elmer, stop!” says his wife. “You’re dreaming that un-American dream again.”

The attitude changed in 1968 when Prince Philip persuaded a reluctant queen to let the television cameras behind palace doors for a fly-on-the-wall program. What mystique the family had was lost overnight as it was revealed in all its splendor—and its ordinariness.

The anarchic Ralph Steadman immediately portrayed the royals as the dysfunctional family next door for the satirical magazine Private Eye. The queen is in an apron; a lank-haired Charles is hunched over a guitar; his lumpy sister, Anne, looks on grumpily while their brother Andrew picks his nose. Carl Giles of the Sunday Express felt he could now show the royal couple at home in vast, separate four-poster beds or at breakfast in their bathrobes.

Courtesy of the Cartoon Museum.

‘Visit to Ireland’ by Dave Brown, from the May 23, 2011, edition of the Independent.

Despite this liberation the queen remains a passive figure, sought out only if there is a crisis in the Commonwealth, a row over royal finances or a controversial state occasion such as the visit of the much-reviled Japanese Emperor Hirohito in 1971. At the formal dinner, Mac of the Daily Mail has a manservant placing a boot on Hirohito’s plate. Philip says to him: “I don’t care what you ate during the war, Perkins, the Emperor will have venison like the rest of us.”

We don’t know how the queen reacts, because her back is to the observer.

Come the 1990s, the press and the public turned against the royals as they became mired in financial woes and riven by the divorce of Charles and Diana. But even then, the monarchy—the institution rather than the erring royals—was portrayed more in sorrow than satire. Nicholas Garland showed its members as an Endangered Species, bereft in long grass like hunted animals poised on extinction.

Surprisingly perhaps, unkind images of the queen are few. Trog, aka Wally Fawkes, has her as a jolly knockabout figure with tombstone teeth pulling pints in the bar of the TV soap “EastEnders,” but the angry brigade, Martin Rowson and Steve Bell of the Guardian and Dave Brown of the Independent, emphasize the grotesque. Mr. Rowson shows the queen in 1987 with curling lips and a bulbous nose receiving Margaret Thatcher, but the target is not Her Majesty but the then prime minister—a sharp-nosed harpy with Cruella de Vil talons. Even the royal pet corgi is snarling at her as if a surrogate for its mistress’s irritation.

Peter Brookes of the London Times, perhaps the cleverest of the contemporary lot, says: “It is when the queen is involved with politics that the stories crop up. That’s why the Gillrays and Rowlandsons had a go—the monarchy was political in those days and a fair target. I am ambivalent about the monarchy. My head tells me that it is a nonsense but my heart completely disagrees. That’s why I don’t actively seek reasons for drawing her, because I know I shall be pulling my punches.”

One of his contributions to the exhibition has Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip dressed to the nines in a song-and-dance parody of Irving Berlin’s “We’re a Couple of Swells.”

“I know it’s gentle,” he says, “but there is nothing to be vicious about. There’s no point in putting an exhibition together of attacks on the queen, because you’d just have bare walls.”

Maybe the attitude to Her Maj is summed up by Martin Honeysett, who portrayed the Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip heroically line dancing during the state visit to Ireland in 2011.

An onlooker says: “Well, I think the Queen is trying really hard.”

Mr. Holledge is a freelance arts writer based in the U.K.

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)